Which MCP Security Tool Fits Your Stack? 7 Options Compared
Compare seven MCP security tools by control point, operating boundary, and proof requirements, from scanners to gateways and runtime controls.
Read articleAgentGuard Research
Practical guidance, independent reviews, and clear explanations for teams building AI agents that can take real action.
Compare seven MCP security tools by control point, operating boundary, and proof requirements, from scanners to gateways and runtime controls.
Read articleCompare seven AI runtime security tools by enforcement point, documented scope, best fit, and the POC needed to verify agent action control.
Read articleCompare six AI security companies by the control point they document: discovery, inspection, action enforcement, and investigation evidence.
Read articlePrompt injection lets untrusted text override an AI system’s intended instructions. It may come directly from users or indirectly through webpages, documents, emails, and tools. Defenses should separate data from authority, restrict permissions, validate actions externally, require approval for sensitive operations, and log decisions. Simple phrase filtering is insufficient protection.
Read articleZenity may be in the conversation because its platform is positioned around securing enterprise AI, low-code, and agentic applications. An alternative only makes sense when the buyer can name the workflow, control point, evidence, and residual risk they need.
Read articleAn LLM agent becomes a security problem when untrusted input can change a decision that reaches a tool, credential, data store, or external destination. The useful question is not which framework name applies. It is where that influence crosses a trust boundary.
Read articleAn agent can make a bad security decision before it ever calls a tool: it can accept a package, plugin, skill, tool description, or MCP server that is not what its owner believes it to be.
Read articleAgentGuard and Lakera both address risks created when AI systems call tools, access data, and act across connected systems. The useful comparison is not a feature checklist. It is whether the control point you need is a developer's local runtime and component intake, an organization-wide agent discovery and governance layer, or a combination of both.
Read articlePrevent MCP response spoofing by separating endpoint identity, message integrity, prompt manipulation, and compromised-server behavior.
Read articleLearn how to secure enterprise AI agents across identity, tools, runtime actions, memory, monitoring, and governance with a practical rollout checklist.
Read article